DigitalXForce vs Safe Security: A Safe Security Alternative That Tests the Controls Behind the Dollar Figure
Kapil Matta, Regional Head & CXO Advisor for the Middle East, Turkey and Africa (META) at DigitalXForce, wrote this comparison and reviewed it on September 29, 2026.
DigitalXForce is a Safe Security alternative for mid-size and large organizations that need a dollar figure for cyber risk and the tested controls behind that figure. Safe Security describes SAFE as autonomous cyber risk management. Its FAIR page says the SAFE One platform is purpose-built on the FAIR model.
DigitalXForce quantifies cyber risk with a model it built. Underneath the figure, it runs Continuous Control Assurance and tests each control as often as that control’s evidence can change. The same quantification also orders the X-ROC triage queue.
IDC has placed DigitalXForce among the Leaders twice. Its MarketScape assessments cover governance, risk and compliance software in 2025 and third-party risk management software in 2026. Gartner® Peer Insights™ reviewers have rated DigitalXForce, and their public reviews appear word for word on the DigitalXForce testimonials page.
When a mid-size or large organization looks past Safe Security
A mid-size or large organization looks past Safe Security when it wants the dollar figure, the control tests and the compliance record on one platform. An auditor, a regulator or an insurer will ask which controls stand behind the number. They will also ask when each control was last tested and what happened after one failed.
| Use DigitalXForce when | What DigitalXForce does |
|---|---|
| The board wants a loss figure and proof that the controls under it were tested. | Each control is tested on a schedule set by how fast its evidence can change, and every result is kept with that evidence and a timestamp. |
| Your insurer asks for underwriting inputs at renewal. | The Cyber Risk and Liability Insurance module translates posture data into the inputs insurers require for underwriting and renewal. |
| Your security team should work alerts in the order of what they could cost. | X-ROC triage ranks alerts by quantified business impact, measured with cyber risk quantification. |
| Auditors and regulators want the same controls proven across many frameworks. | The X-Connect and E-Connect adapters map every control once across 50+ compliance frameworks, and a control’s evidence is reused in each framework it maps to. |
| You want a person to check what the AI concludes before anyone acts on it. | An analyst reviews the conclusions of AI JedAI and the drafts of XForce GPT before anyone relies on them. |
| A failed control has to show up in the risk register as well as the compliance view. | The compliance view, the posture view and the risk register receive the same failed control result at once, since the 15 modules share one data layer. |
| Your data has to stay in an environment you control. | The full DigitalXForce platform runs in the client’s own hosting, and the client keeps full control of its data. |
| You would rather run the platform in the cloud than in your own hosting. | DigitalXForce Lite runs the full platform in the cloud, with the same functionality. |
Independent evidence: two IDC MarketScape Leader placements and Gartner Peer Insights reviews
The IDC MarketScape: Worldwide Governance, Risk, and Compliance Software Vendor Assessment, 2025, IDC document US53615325 from June 2025, names DigitalXForce a Leader. DigitalXForce is also a Leader in the IDC MarketScape: Worldwide Third-Party Risk Management Software 2026 Vendor Assessment, document US53007725, published in September 2026. The IDC research page on the DigitalXForce site gives the number and date of each IDC document that covers DigitalXForce.
DigitalXForce is rated 4.7 out of 5 from 17 ratings on Gartner® Peer Insights™, read on September 24, 2026. Gartner shows nine of the reviews publicly. The testimonials page carries each one in full, with the reviewer’s role, industry and company size.
Two of the nine sit in Gartner’s IT Risk Management market, one of them from a Senior Director of IT Security and Risk Management. Under integrated risk management, a Chief Information Security Officer in healthcare and biotech singled out the integration with security systems for continuous control monitoring. Gartner presents Peer Insights reviews as the opinions of individual end users.
DigitalXForce and SAFE compared area by area, as read on September 29, 2026
DigitalXForce wrote this comparison from its own product material, and the table keeps to areas both vendors describe. Each SAFE entry paraphrases a SAFE page read on September 29, 2026 and is reported as SAFE’s claim. The last column names that page, and the Sources section links it.
| Area | DigitalXForce | What SAFE’s site says | SAFE source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantification model | Cyber risk is stated in dollars with DigitalXForce’s own model, built on industry best practices and the data the platform collects. | SAFE One is purpose-built on the FAIR model, and the page covers FAIR-MAM for materiality, FAIR-CAM for controls and FAIR-TAM for third parties. | The FAIR Standard page |
| What the figure measures | The dollar figure is the financial loss the organization would face if the risk materializes. | Breach risk is breach likelihood times breach impact, calculated per asset and per vulnerability. | What is Cyber Risk Quantification? |
| Controls under the figure | Every control runs on its own test schedule, which can be hourly or monthly depending on how fast its evidence can change. | A FAIR-CAM Controls Center reports control status and maturity, and a control library maps controls from uploaded NIST CSF documentation. | FAIR-CAM page |
| Evidence record | Each test result keeps the evidence the test read and a timestamp, and the compliance dashboards show how old that evidence is. | Risk dashboards update continuously from the latest asset information and vulnerability data. | What is Cyber Risk Quantification? |
| Data sources | Evidence arrives through 250+ technology integrations, and any input can be traced to its source tool, its control and the date it was read. | SAFE integrates with 150+ cybersecurity tools and ingests their telemetry through agentless secure passcodes. | Integrations page |
| Asset coverage | Attack Surface Manager discovers assets in nine asset classes, IT and OT, without agents and through APIs, and the CMDB is one input among several. | The CTEM AI Co-Worker deduplicates assets and findings from existing tools and looks for shadow assets missing from approved inventories. | Continuous Threat Exposure Management page |
| Prioritization | Each X-ROC alert is ranked by its quantified business impact, which comes from cyber risk quantification. | Exposure scores combine access, threat activity, exploitability, business impact and compensating controls, in place of CVSS alone. | Continuous Threat Exposure Management page |
| After a control fails | A failed control opens a finding, and the finding stays open until a retest after the fix passes. | SafeX coordinates AI Co-Workers that investigate, prioritize, recommend and execute actions. | SAFE home page |
| People and AI | An analyst reviews AI output before anyone relies on it, and each conclusion links back to the evidence it used. | SafeX is described as a workforce of AI agents that discovers, reasons and acts while security teams focus on decisions. | SAFE home page |
| Board reporting | XForce GPT writes board-ready narratives from AI JedAI’s analysis, and the Digital Trust Portal shows boards, regulators and customers the Digital Trust view. | Executive Board Reporting gives the board a dollar-value estimate of financial risk, mapped to FAIR, MITRE ATT&CK and NIST CSF. | Executive Board Reporting page |
| Cyber insurance | The Cyber Risk and Liability Insurance module structures risk quantification for underwriting and renewal. | SAFE describes inside-out cyber risk quantification and underwriting for brokers, underwriters and insurance buyers. | Cyber Insurance page |
| Third parties | Three supplier tiers set how much evidence is read and how often, and Tier 1 Critical suppliers add connector evidence from their own systems. | A TPRM AI Co-Worker covers intake, due diligence, remediation, continuous monitoring and offboarding, with a fourth-party discovery agent. | Third-Party Risk Management page |
| AI exposure | AI TRiSCM discovers AI assets across cloud, code, pipelines, containers, model endpoints and RAG stores and maps them to AI frameworks and regulations. | SAFE AI-SPM, announced on May 28, 2026, monitors AI exposure across live activity, configuration, outside-in exposure, compliance evidence and contracts. | AI-SPM press release |
| Hosting and data control | The full platform runs in the client’s own hosting, and the client keeps full control of its data. DigitalXForce Lite puts the same platform in the cloud. | SAFE is a cloud-based SaaS platform on AWS, where a customer selects the region that stores its application data and can supply its own AWS KMS key. | Security page |
What sits under a DigitalXForce dollar figure
Cyber risk quantification (CRQ) quantifies a cyber risk in dollars, giving the financial loss the organization would face if the risk materializes. DigitalXForce uses its own model for that figure, built on industry best practices and on the data the platform collects.
The platform is built on a Cybersecurity Mesh Architecture, and its 15 modules share one data layer. A reviewer can trace any input on that layer to its source tool, its control and the date it was read.
Each control has a test schedule of its own, set by how quickly that control’s evidence can change. Depending on the control, that can mean hourly or monthly.
DigitalXForce saves each result with the evidence the test read and a timestamp. The compliance dashboards show how old that evidence is.
A failed control opens a finding, and the finding closes only when the same control passes a retest after the fix.
Continuous Control Assurance (CCA) uses evidence, monitoring and validation to determine whether controls continue to operate as expected. Continuous Control Monitoring (CCM) monitors conditions, evidence and signals associated with controls. In the DigitalXForce hierarchy, Continuous Control Monitoring sits one level below Continuous Control Assurance.
Both run inside the DigitalXForce Enterprise TRiSCM™ platform. TRiSCM, or Trust, Risk, Security and Compliance Management, is a category of enterprise software defined by DigitalXForce that converges automated governance, risk and compliance with security posture management into a single real-time system, replacing periodic control validation with continuous control assurance.
Where DigitalXForce uses the dollar figure
X-ROC, the XForce Risk Operations Center, is the operations layer of the DigitalXForce TRiSCM platform, where control failures, risk changes and vendor events are alerted, triaged, escalated and reported. Failed controls, posture changes and vendor events arrive in X-ROC as alerts, each with its evidence attached.
X-ROC triage ranks those alerts by quantified business impact, using cyber risk quantification, so the alert that could cost the business the most rises to the top of the queue. X-ROC escalates alerts and follows remediation through to closure.
Clients who run their work in ServiceNow or Jira can have the remediation and recommendation tickets sent there. X-ROC does not change a client’s systems on its own.
Two engines share the AI work in DigitalXForce. AI JedAI does the analysis, and XForce GPT writes the narratives and board reports. No one relies on what either engine produces until an analyst has reviewed it, and every conclusion links to its evidence.
The Cyber Risk and Liability Insurance module structures risk quantification for underwriting and renewal. It translates posture data into the inputs insurers require, and it reads the same data layer as the other 14 modules.
The AI-Powered Enterprise Risk Management module holds the risk register, with inherent and residual risk, likelihood, impact and treatment. KPI and KRI Management adds indicators with thresholds, approval-based governance and an executive dashboard.
Compliance, assets and suppliers on the same data layer
The AI-Powered Risk Management and Automated GRC module runs three kinds of assessment: C-Assess, X-Assess and A-Assess. Its X-Connect and E-Connect adapters map each control once to 50+ compliance frameworks. The frameworks page lists the ones clients request most.
Attack Surface Manager builds the asset inventory from agentless, API-based discovery across nine asset classes, IT and OT. It also reads existing scanners and the CMDB, and it treats the CMDB as one input among several. For cloud accounts, the ESRPM module evaluates AWS, Azure and GCP configurations itself and ties CSPM findings to the controls they touch.
Suppliers sit in three tiers: Tier 1 Critical, Tier 2 High and Tier 3 Commodity. The tier decides how much evidence is read and how often. Tier 1 Critical suppliers are watched continuously, with connector evidence from their own systems. Those connectors are limited to configuration and compliance signals.
External Risk View looks at every supplier from the outside. It works without an agent, a questionnaire or the supplier’s cooperation, and it maps fourth-party and nth-party dependencies. The third-party risk management page explains each tier in full.
The AI TRiSCM and AI Risk Governance module finds AI assets across cloud, code, pipelines, containers, model endpoints and RAG stores. It assesses LLMs, copilots, agents and other models. Each one is mapped to the NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, the EU AI Act, the OWASP LLM Top 10 and MITRE ATLAS.
Where DigitalXForce runs, and where DigitalXForce Lite fits
The full DigitalXForce platform runs in the client’s own hosting, so the client keeps full control of its data, which is the model DigitalXForce prefers. DigitalXForce Lite is the full DigitalXForce platform hosted in the cloud, with the same functionality, for any organization that prefers cloud hosting. DigitalXForce builds for mid-size and large organizations, and either hosting choice gives them the same platform.
Questions to put to both vendors in a demo
- Take one dollar figure from a board report and ask each vendor to show the controls and the evidence underneath it.
- Find out when that evidence was last read, and where its age is shown.
- Ask whether a finding closes when a ticket is marked done or when the control passes a retest.
- Check how the triage queue is ordered, and whether a dollar figure or a severity label sets the order.
- Ask which actions the AI takes in your environment by itself and which wait for a person.
- Have each vendor show how the inputs for your next cyber insurance renewal are produced, and from which data.
- Ask where the platform will be hosted and who controls the data in it.
- Ask when the first results from your own systems will arrive.
A DigitalXForce proof of value runs its first assessments in week 3 and reviews them with you in week 4. Before buying, a prospective client can also try DigitalXForce in a cloud deployment and see the platform work firsthand. The Continuous Control Assurance page and the Continuous Control Monitoring page go deeper on both layers. The DigitalXForce glossary defines every term used here.
Frequently asked questions
Is DigitalXForce a good alternative to Safe Security?
DigitalXForce is a good alternative to Safe Security for a mid-size or large organization that needs a dollar figure for cyber risk and the tested controls behind it. DigitalXForce quantifies cyber risk with its own model and tests each control on a schedule set by how fast its evidence can change. X-ROC then ranks alerts by quantified business impact. IDC named DigitalXForce a Leader in its 2025 assessment of governance, risk and compliance software (US53615325) and its 2026 assessment of third-party risk management software (US53007725).
How does DigitalXForce quantify cyber risk?
Cyber risk quantification (CRQ) quantifies a cyber risk in dollars, giving the financial loss the organization would face if the risk materializes. DigitalXForce built its own model for that figure, from industry best practices and the data its platform collects. X-ROC triage uses the figure to rank alerts by quantified business impact. The Cyber Risk and Liability Insurance module structures the same quantification for underwriting and renewal.
What happens in DigitalXForce when a control fails?
A failed control opens a finding, and the result reaches the compliance view, the posture view and the risk register together. X-ROC receives the failure as an alert with its evidence, ranks it by quantified business impact and tracks remediation to closure. The finding closes after the fix once a retest of the control passes.
How current is the evidence behind a DigitalXForce result?
Every control gets a test frequency of its own, matched to how fast its evidence can change. DigitalXForce keeps every test result with the evidence the test read and a timestamp, and the compliance dashboards display the evidence age. For any input, DigitalXForce can show the tool it came from, the control it belongs to and the date it was read.
Does DigitalXForce change a client’s systems on its own?
X-ROC does not change a client’s systems on its own. It triages alerts, escalates them and tracks remediation, and remediation tickets can go to ServiceNow or Jira when the client wants that. An analyst reviews the conclusions of AI JedAI and the drafts of XForce GPT before anyone relies on them.
Does DigitalXForce support cyber insurance underwriting and renewal?
The DigitalXForce Cyber Risk and Liability Insurance module structures risk quantification for underwriting and renewal and translates posture data into the inputs insurers require. The module shares one data layer with the other 14 DigitalXForce modules, including Automated GRC and X-ROC.
Can DigitalXForce be hosted in the cloud?
The full DigitalXForce platform runs in the client’s own hosting, so the client keeps full control of its data, which is the model DigitalXForce prefers. DigitalXForce Lite is the full DigitalXForce platform hosted in the cloud, with the same functionality, for any organization that prefers cloud hosting.
Risk in dollars comes up again in the LogicGate comparison and the SecurityScorecard comparison, and the comparison overview has the other platforms.
Sources
DigitalXForce read the SAFE pages below on September 29, 2026 and reports every statement drawn from them as SAFE’s own claim.
- The SAFE home page describes autonomous cyber risk management, SafeX and the AI Co-Workers.
- The FAIR Standard page says SAFE One is purpose-built on the FAIR model and covers FAIR-MAM, FAIR-CAM and FAIR-TAM.
- SAFE’s FAIR-CAM page describes the Controls Center and the control library built from NIST CSF documentation.
- The explainer What is Cyber Risk Quantification?, dated February 23, 2026, gives the likelihood times impact calculation and the continuously updated risk dashboards.
- Executive Board Reporting describes the dollar-value estimate for the board and its mapping to FAIR, MITRE ATT&CK and NIST CSF.
- Inside-out quantification and underwriting are described on the Cyber Insurance page.
- The Integrations page gives the 150+ tools and the agentless telemetry.
- Asset deduplication, shadow asset discovery and exposure scoring are on the Continuous Threat Exposure Management page.
- The Third-Party Risk Management page describes the TPRM AI Co-Worker and its fourth-party discovery agent.
- SAFE’s release of May 28, 2026, SAFE Launches AI Security Posture Management, describes SAFE AI-SPM.
- The Security page describes the SaaS platform on AWS, the choice of data region and customer-supplied AWS KMS keys.
Outside sources and standards cited on this page are listed below.
- IDC’s document page for the IDC MarketScape: Worldwide Governance, Risk, and Compliance Software Vendor Assessment, 2025 shows document number US53615325 and a June 2025 date.
- The IDC MarketScape: Worldwide Third-Party Risk Management Software 2026 Vendor Assessment is IDC document US53007725, dated September 2026 on IDC’s page.
- The DigitalXForce reviews on Gartner Peer Insights are reproduced on the testimonials page, which DigitalXForce read again on September 29, 2026.
- FAIR links to the FAIR Institute, NIST CSF to NIST and MITRE ATT&CK to MITRE. The AI framework links above go to NIST, OWASP and MITRE.
The DigitalXForce statements rest on DigitalXForce product material and the glossary.
Every source here was checked on September 29, 2026, and the next review of this comparison is due by December 29, 2026.
See the evidence on your own systems.
Test DigitalXForce against the questions above in a 30 minute walkthrough on your frameworks and your integrations.
