Compliance status says whether an organization met a framework’s requirements when it was last assessed, and control effectiveness says whether each control does its job now. This article explains why the two disagree, how a board can tell them apart, and how Continuous Control Assurance (CCA) keeps the second answer current between audits.
Moving GRC off spreadsheets works when the steps are taken in order, starting with a clean control inventory and ending with one audit cycle run in parallel. This guide sets out the 6 steps and says when a compliance automation product is the better fit.
How to Move GRC From Spreadsheets to an Automated Platform Read More »
A security operations center works on attacks as they happen, and a risk operations center works on the exposure behind them, ranked by business impact. This article compares the two centers and shows how DigitalXForce X-ROC runs the risk side.
Risk operations center vs security operations center Read More »
A risk operations center is an operating model for continuously measuring, prioritizing and reducing risk. This comparison sets DigitalXForce X-ROC beside Qualys and Brinqa, two vendors that describe one on their own pages, and compares all three on the five points a buyer can check in a demo.
Risk operations center vendors compared: DigitalXForce X-ROC, Qualys and Brinqa Read More »
No single vendor sells a whole cybersecurity mesh architecture, since a mesh connects the tools an organization already runs. This comparison places each vendor on the four layers using its own description. DigitalXForce sells the policy, posture and dashboard layers and connects to the others through 250+ technology integrations.
Cybersecurity Mesh Architecture Vendors Compared: Who Covers Which Layer Read More »
A cybersecurity mesh architecture has four layers: security analytics and intelligence, a distributed identity fabric, consolidated policy and posture management, and consolidated dashboards. This article explains each one in plain terms, names the tools that live there, and shows what a risk and compliance team reads from it.
The Four Layers of a Cybersecurity Mesh Architecture, Explained for Risk Teams Read More »
Zero Trust decides who gets access and on what terms. A cybersecurity mesh architecture is the structure that lets separate security tools enforce that decision together and prove it. This article separates the two, in NIST’s and Gartner’s own words, and shows what the difference means for a risk and compliance team.
DigitalXForce brings Continuous Control Assurance to the tools an organization already runs, ServiceNow included. Continuous Control Assurance (CCA) uses evidence, monitoring and validation to determine whether controls continue to operate as expected. DigitalXForce reads the evidence through 250+ technology integrations and maps each control once across 50+ compliance frameworks. This page is for a mid-size
DigitalXForce takes a compliance program past audit readiness to Continuous Control Assurance. Continuous Control Assurance (CCA) uses evidence, monitoring and validation to determine whether controls continue to operate as expected. DigitalXForce tests controls against live data from the security stack, maps each control once to 50+ compliance frameworks and keeps security posture and third-party risk
DigitalXForce vs Drata: Which Platform Fits Which Program Read More »
DigitalXForce tests controls against live data from the security stack, maps each control once to 50+ compliance frameworks and keeps security posture and third-party risk on the same data layer. Continuous Control Assurance (CCA) uses evidence, monitoring and validation to determine whether controls continue to operate as expected. MetricStream calls its product an AI-first Connected
DigitalXForce vs MetricStream: Which Platform Fits Which Program Read More »
Era of Automated Security Risk and Posture Management
Era of Automated Third Party Risk Management: Trust but Verify
Era of Automated Security Plans, Standards, Policies and Procedures
